This is the assigned case to use to write the case brief it needs to be like the

This is the assigned case to use to write the case brief it needs to be like the sample case provided in the files below. Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. 370 (2010) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/560/370/ The 3 additional sources needed to be used https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep560/usrep560370/usrep560370.pdf https://www.quimbee.com/cases/berghuis-v-thompkins https://biz.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Constitutional_Law/Constitutional_Law_(Lumen)/07%3A_Self_Incrimination_and_the_5th_amendment/7.05%3A_Berghuis_v._Thompkins_560_U.S._370_(2010) U.S. Supreme Court Berghuis v. Thompkins The one from West Law…

This is the assigned case to use to write the case brief it
needs to be like the sample case provided in the files below.
Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. 370 (2010)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/560/370/
The 3 additional sources needed to be used
https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep560/usrep560370/usrep560370.pdf
https://www.quimbee.com/cases/berghuis-v-thompkins
https://biz.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Constitutional_Law/Constitutional_Law_(Lumen)/07%3A_Self_Incrimination_and_the_5th_amendment/7.05%3A_Berghuis_v._Thompkins_560_U.S._370_(2010)

U.S. Supreme Court Berghuis v. Thompkins

The one from West Law is the main Source
This needs to be 4 pages double spaced.
Students will prepare a detailed case analysis including in this analysis the following components, the key facts of the case, the legal issue, the rationale of the majority, the persepective of the dissent if any, the judicial philosophy of the judge who wrote the majority opinion, any criminogical, socialogical, historical, political, economic, or cultural trends or events.